and sexual access is the currency they have to offer.
It’s a lovely theory, one that just less sexually inclined than men, but neither are they naturally monogamous.
This idea would go on to shape not just the perception of women, but the understanding of human sexuality.
We like to think that we’re a logical species – that we see the world with gimlet-eyed clarity and a belief in science and evidence above all else.
Whether it’s a case of chasing after numbers, finding a no-strings-attached hook-up , a lack of nookie in a committed relationship or even just managing to lose one’s virginity, it often seems like sexual fulfillment is something that happens to It’s a constant source of frustration, angst, even self-harm in men. In fact, the dominant narrative for the last two hundred years has been that women are inherently the “purer” sex, the ones who are biologically inclined to monogamy, who are the less lustful of the species.
We ascribe modern morality and concepts to our paleolithic ancestors because we believe that it was always thus.
This is never more evident than in evolutionary psychology.
Much of our belief about human sexuality – the importance and universality of monogamy, for example – stem from the Flintsonization of primitive cultures.
Darwin was a notorious prude and this directly influenced his interpretations of evolution, as well as the interpretations of those who came after him.
Search for geekdatingsite com:
The goal of evo-psych is to show that our modern behavior is inborn, that everything from whom we’re attracted to, to social dynamics, is born out of evolution instead of societal change.